Security as a Service (SecaaS)
Your whole security stack, as one subscription.
Security as a Service means you consume security controls and the operation behind them rather than buying, integrating and staffing each one. PrahiX delivers that on a single platform - detection, response, network and video telemetry under one data model, one console and one renewal date, instead of seven products that each need their own.
continuous monitoring and escalation, including nights and holidays
platform for security, network and video - not seven consoles and a bridge call
separate SIEM licence to buy, tune or renew underneath the service
Why buying security one product at a time stops working.
Nobody sets out to run seven security subscriptions. It happens one renewal at a time, each purchase sensible on its own, until the estate is a collection of consoles that no single person can see across.
Subscription sprawl outpaces the team watching it
Email security, endpoint, web filtering, identity, vulnerability scanning, logging - each arrives as its own contract with its own console and its own alerting. The tools multiply faster than the people who can read them.
The seams between products are where incidents live
Each product is authoritative about its own slice and blind to the rest. A phished credential, a new endpoint process and an outbound connection are one attack seen three times, and no console holds all three.
You still own the integration work you thought you had outsourced
Buying a control as a service moves the hosting, not the joining-up. Somebody in your team still has to make seven products agree on what a user is, what an asset is, and which alert matters.
Renewals arrive separately and never get compared
Staggered contracts mean the security budget is never reviewed as a whole. Overlapping capability gets renewed twice, genuine gaps go unnoticed, and the true cost of the stack is never on one page.
What you get when security is delivered as a service.
The controls, the correlation and the response arrive together and are operated for you - priced as a subscription rather than as a capital project plus a hiring plan.
Cloud-delivered controls, no appliances to size
Detection, correlation and response run on the platform rather than on hardware you specify, buy and refresh. Capacity is the provider's problem, and getting the sizing wrong is no longer a capital write-off.
One data model across the estate
Network devices, servers, endpoints, cloud, identity and cameras are normalised into the same schema, so a correlation rule can reason across all of them instead of within one product's view.
Detection and response in the same system
Correlation that fires a containment playbook directly - isolate the host, revoke the token, block the address - with no integration seam between the thing that decides and the thing that acts.
One renewal, one line item
The stack is reviewed as a whole and priced as a whole. Overlapping capability shows up as overlap rather than hiding in two contracts that renew four months apart.
Coverage that starts before the rollout finishes
Onboarding begins with the highest-signal sources - identity, perimeter, endpoints - so real detection is running well before the last device is connected.
Evidence accumulates as a by-product
Retained incident timelines, response actions and monitoring records build up while the service runs, so an audit draws on what already exists rather than on a reconstruction.
SecaaS that includes the network and the cameras.
Most Security as a Service offerings stop at security telemetry. PrahiX was built as a unified operations platform, so availability data and physical-security data are in the same timeline as the security events - which is where a surprising number of real incidents are actually visible.
Availability and attack surface are one estate
A saturated uplink and a beaconing endpoint can be the same story. When both are on one platform, that story gets told once instead of becoming two tickets on two teams with two priorities.
Physical security is in scope, not in another building
Camera and access-control telemetry join the same incident timeline, so a tailgated door followed by an anomalous login is investigated as one event rather than two unrelated ones.
SOC as a Service is a layer of this, not a separate contract
The staffed operation that watches and triages runs on the same platform as the controls it is watching, so there is no gap between the tooling you subscribe to and the people reading it.
Automation closes the loop on both sides
The same engine that contains a threat also clears the known network fault - restart the service, fail the link over - because the platform that detects it is the platform holding the runbook.
The difference when a credential is phished
Seven separate subscriptions
- The email gateway logs a delivered message and considers the matter closed.
- The endpoint tool records an unusual process and scores it as low.
- The firewall sees an outbound connection to an address it has no opinion about.
- Three products, three consoles, three sub-threshold events, no incident.
PrahiX Security as a Service
- The same three signals land in one data model within seconds of each other.
- Correlation promotes them as a single incident with the full sequence attached.
- The playbook isolates the host and revokes the session before anyone is called.
- The escalation that reaches you already carries the whole chain, not one fragment.
How Security as a Service works with us.
Four stages, running continuously. You can see all four - this is an operated service, not a black box that sends you a monthly PDF.
Scope what you already have
We start with the stack you are running and the contracts underneath it. Some of it is worth keeping and ingesting rather than replacing, and knowing which is which up front is what stops a migration turning into a rebuild.
Connect the estate
Agentless collection over SNMP, syslog, NetFlow and APIs brings in network devices, servers, endpoints, cloud, identity and - where you run them - cameras and access control. Highest-signal sources first.
Operate continuously
Telemetry is normalised and correlated in real time against MITRE ATT&CK-mapped detections and behavioural baselines. AI triage collapses the noise, an analyst confirms what is promoted, and playbooks contain what is confirmed.
Review as one stack
Coverage, incidents and cost are reported against the whole estate rather than per product, so the quarterly conversation is about where the gaps actually are instead of about seven separate renewals.
What Security as a Service replaces.
The honest comparison is not licence against licence. It is everything you would otherwise buy, join together and keep running.
| Capability | Buy each control yourself | Point tools + an MSSP | PrahiX Security as a Service |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security controls | Bought, sized and refreshed per product | Usually yours to license; the MSSP watches them | Delivered on the platform as part of the service |
| Correlation | A SIEM to license, deploy and tune | Yours to own, theirs to read | Runs on the platform - no separate licence |
| Joining the products up | Your integration project, indefinitely | Still yours - the MSSP consumes what you built | One data model, nothing to integrate |
| Response | A SOAR project of its own | Notification, containment left with you | Playbooks integrated with detection from day one |
| Network monitoring | A separate NMS and a separate team | Out of scope - a different contract | Same platform, same console, same incident |
| Physical security | Rarely connected at all | Almost never in scope | Cameras and access control on the same timeline |
| Cost model | Capex per product, plus permanent headcount | Subscription, plus the tooling you still own | One operating subscription |
Evidence-ready for India's mandates
Continuous monitoring and retained timelines, so an audit draws on what the service already produces. Sector specifics are on the SEBI CSCRF and RBI framework pages.
- CERT-In incident-reporting readiness
- RBI IT & Cyber Security Framework alignment
- SEBI CSCRF readiness
- ISO 27001:2022-aligned controls · DPDP Act-aligned handling
Trusted by operations teams across India
Have Questions? We've Got Answers.
Security as a Service means buying security capability as an operated subscription rather than as products you deploy and staff yourself. The provider owns the tooling, hosts it, keeps it current and runs the operation behind it; you consume the outcome. SecaaS is an umbrella term - it covers the controls themselves, the monitoring that watches them, and the response that acts on what they find.
In cloud computing, SecaaS sits alongside SaaS, PaaS and IaaS as a delivery model: the security function is delivered from the provider's cloud rather than from appliances in your building. Practically, that means there is no hardware for you to size, buy or refresh, and capacity planning becomes the provider's problem. It does not mean everything is inspected in the cloud - traffic that never leaves your site still needs something local to see it, which is worth pinning down with any provider before you sign.
Common SecaaS categories are identity and access management, email and web security, endpoint detection and response, cloud-delivered firewalling, vulnerability management, security monitoring and SIEM, and incident response. Most organisations buy several of these from different vendors. The PrahiX approach is to deliver the monitoring, correlation and response layers on one platform, and to ingest from the control products you already own rather than insisting you replace them.
They overlap, and the vocabulary is used loosely. An MSSP typically manages tools you still own and license. MDR is usually scoped to endpoints and to detections its vendor ships. SOC as a Service is the staffed operations centre delivered as a service. SecaaS is the widest of the four - it is the delivery model for security capability generally, and a managed SOC is one layer inside it. Our SOC layer is described in full on the SOC as a Service page.
No, and we would usually advise against doing it all at once. Where a control is working and has term left on it, we ingest from it and correlate its telemetry with everything else. Replacement makes sense where a product is duplicating something the platform already does, or where its renewal is the thing making the stack expensive. That assessment happens during scoping, before anything is committed.
Data residency and access are agreed before onboarding, not after. This matters more under the DPDP Act than it did before it, and it is a fair question to ask of any cloud-delivered security provider - ask for the specific region rather than a reassurance. Our handling is set out on the DPDP compliance page.
It is priced against the size and shape of your estate - how many sources, how much telemetry, which layers you want operated, and what you already own that can be ingested instead of replaced. We do not publish a rate card, because a number quoted before anyone has looked at your estate is a guess rather than a proposal. What we will do is scope it against what you actually run.
Yes, and it is how most engagements begin. We scope a POC around a defined slice - a site, a business unit, or a specific set of sources - connect it, and run real detection, triage and response against your own traffic. You end up evaluating results on your estate rather than a demo on ours.
Keep reading
Start with a proof of concept, not a procurement cycle.
Tell us what you already run and we will scope a POC on a real slice of your estate - and say plainly which of your current subscriptions we would keep.